In San Diego, a simple trespassing charge can escalate into a felony “Aggravated Trespass” crisis the moment a threat is alleged. Whether it’s a workplace dispute or a domestic fallout, this charge threatens your freedom and your professional future. At the Law Offices of Logan Noblin, we specialize in dismantling the prosecution’s narrative to protect your liberty.
Don’t Let a Misunderstanding
Define Your Future
In San Diego, the District Attorney’s office often views Aggravated Trespass (PC 601) as an “open and shut” case once they have a statement from a fearful witness. They expect you to accept a plea deal that leaves a permanent mark on your record. We refuse to let our clients be steamrolled by an incomplete narrative.
Logan Noblin utilizes a warrior’s tenacity and an author’s precision to deconstruct the prosecution’s version of events, focusing on the critical legal gaps they hope you’ll overlook:
Defense In Every Corner
Challenging the “Credible Threat”
Under PC 601, the prosecution must prove you made a “credible threat” to cause serious bodily injury. We prove that the alleged statement was either non-existent, hyperbolic “venting,” or lacked the actual intent to cause fear. If the threat wasn’t legally credible, the “Aggravated” charge cannot stand.
The 30-Day Proximity Defense
California law requires that the unauthorized entry occur within 30 days of the alleged threat. We utilize digital forensics, location data, and strict timelines to prove that the entry was either outside this window or entirely unrelated to any prior dispute, breaking the legal link required for a conviction.
Constitutional Free Speech Defense
The line between an illegal threat and protected First Amendment speech is often blurred by overzealous prosecutors. We protect your rights by arguing that “heated rhetoric” in the context of a labor dispute, political protest, or personal argument does not constitute a criminal act.
The “Lawful Purpose” Rebuttal
Aggravated Trespass requires that you entered a property with the specific intent to carry out a threat. We shift the narrative by demonstrating your entry was for a legitimate, lawful reason—such as retrieving your own property, a business necessity, or a good-faith mistake regarding boundaries.
Judicial Diversion Offensive
For misdemeanor filings, we often bypass the prosecutor entirely and petition the judge for Judicial Diversion (PC 1001.95). This allows you to complete court-ordered requirements—like community service or counseling—in exchange for the case being fully dismissed and sealed, keeping your record unblemished.
The "No Intent to Terrorize" Pivot
Aggravated Trespass is often a “he-said, she-said” battle. We utilize witness statements and character evidence to prove that the interaction was a misunderstanding during a chaotic moment rather than a willful attempt to harass or frighten the other party.
The Wins
Faced with the reality that they could not prove a “credible threat” or “criminal intent,” the DA agreed to drop the Felony Aggravated Trespass charge entirely. The client avoided a prison sentence, preserved his clean record, and successfully moved forward with his civil claim for unpaid wages.
Our Proven 4-Step Blueprint
An Aggravated Trespass arrest in San Diego triggers a fast-moving legal clock. While the prosecution is busy building a narrative of a “dangerous intruder,” Logan Noblin uses a tactical roadmap to seize control of the story before it ever reaches a jury. We don’t just react to the charges; we systematically dismantle them.
01
We never take the police report at face value. In Aggravated Trespass cases, officers often focus solely on the “victim’s” fear rather than the defendant’s intent. We secure the evidence the police missed:
02
In many San Diego cases, there is a critical window between the arrest and the moment the District Attorney decides to file formal charges. This is where Logan’s “Strategist” side is most lethal:
03
If the prosecution proceeds, we apply intense pressure to force a favorable resolution. We use Logan’s reputation as a top-tier litigator to negotiate from a position of strength:
04
The ultimate goal is a clean slate. We prepare every case as if it is going to a jury to ensure we have maximum leverage for a win:
Common Questions
Under California Penal Code 601, trespass becomes “aggravated” when it involves two specific elements: first, making a credible threat to cause serious bodily injury to someone, and second, entering that person’s home or workplace without permission within 30 days of the threat with the intent to carry it out. Simple trespass (PC 602) usually only involves the unlawful entry itself.
Possession of a key or a previous code does not grant absolute immunity. If your permission to enter was revoked (e.g., you were fired or a romantic partner ended the relationship) or if the prosecution can prove you entered with the specific intent to execute a threat, the “legal” access provided by a key is nullified.
A credible threat is a statement or pattern of conduct—made orally, in writing, or electronically—that places the target in reasonable fear for their safety or the safety of their family. We frequently argue that “venting,” hyperbolic social media posts, or “angry outbursts” during a divorce or workplace dispute do not meet this legal standard because they lack the specific intent to cause fear.
PC 601 is a “wobbler,” meaning it can be filed as a felony or a misdemeanor. Our primary goal is to use mitigation and pre-filing intervention to keep the case at the misdemeanor level or, ideally, have it reduced further to a simple trespass (PC 602) or a non-criminal infraction.
Yes, but typically only for misdemeanor filings. Under PC 1001.95, a judge can pause the proceedings while you complete requirements like counseling or community service. Upon successful completion, the case is dismissed and your arrest record is sealed. We fight to keep your case in the “misdemeanor” category specifically to keep this dismissal path open.
This is one of our strongest defenses. To be guilty of Aggravated Trespass, you must enter with the intent to execute the threat. If we can prove—via texts, witnesses, or video—that your intent was actually a “lawful purpose,” such as retrieving your laptop, tools, or personal documents, the core of the prosecution’s case collapses.
Under PC 601, the prosecution must prove that your entry onto the property occurred within 30 days of the alleged credible threat. If the entry happened 31 days or more after the threat was made, you cannot be convicted of Aggravated Trespass. We use timestamps, digital logs, and witness accounts to challenge the timeline of the state’s case.
Yes. In a workplace setting, the law only requires that you entered and “carried out an act to locate” the threatened person. You do not have to make physical contact or even see them to be charged with a felony. We focus on dismantling the “intent” element—proving you were there for a lawful reason rather than to execute a threat.
Unlike simple trespass, Aggravated Trespass is a “wobbler” that can be filed as a felony. If convicted of the felony version, you face a lifetime ban on owning or possessing firearms in California. Even a misdemeanor conviction carries a 10-year prohibition. Protecting your firearm rights is a primary focus of our “Tactical Pivot” during negotiations.
No. The law specifically states that you cannot be guilty of Aggravated Trespass if you enter your own residence or your own workplace. This is a powerful defense for employees or residents who are falsely accused following a heated dispute. We utilize employment records and lease agreements to establish your legal right to be on the premises.
No. While it is a serious charge that can lead to prison time, PC 601 is not currently classified as a “Strike” or a “Violent Felony.” However, it is considered a crime of moral turpitude for immigration purposes, which could lead to deportation for non-citizens. We coordinate with immigration experts to ensure your status is protected during a case.
Stalking (PC 646.9) requires a pattern of conduct—multiple acts of following or harassing. Aggravated Trespass can be a single event: one threat followed by one entry. Because the penalties for stalking are often harsher, we fight to ensure the prosecution doesn’t “stack” charges or mischaracterize a single isolated incident as a pattern of behavior.
